6 responses to “A drive down Austin memory lane”

  1. Aaron

    Alice Ave. looks to be the south­ern continu­ation of Burnet, curving in a similar manner to Medical Parkway. Looks like it ends at 40th, prob­ably where the Shell gas station is today. And Forest Trail looks to be still intact, start­ing at Enfield just west of that park along MoPac. No idea why it was ever that prominent.

  2. matthew

    Yeah, it looks like it’s Medical Parkway. Maybe they renamed it when Seton was built in the 60’s.

  3. Faberge L'Eggs

    How much of Austin’s growth is due to annex­a­tion, and how much due to “actual” growth? It would be inter­est­ing to see a map with all the (quasi-)concentric circles repres­ent­ing the expan­sion of the city limits.

    Austin just surpassed Columbus, itself a very fast-growing city by Midwestern stand­ards, to become the 15th biggest in the US. But places like Atlanta or Boston are screwed because their respect­ive states prohibit them from absorb­ing their suburbs the way Texas and Arizona allow.

  4. matthew

    It is a mixture of both. It’s kind of diffi­cult to explain in a single state­ment — the vast major­ity of Austin’s growth has come in areas that were annexed within the past 20 years. But most of that land was empty, some of it was not. So Austin’s growth has come from annex­a­tion, but not all of it has been from annex­ing exist­ing unin­cor­por­ated areas.

    For example, the Anderson Mill census-designated-place, where I grew up, has always had an Austin mail­ing address but was only just now annexed into Austin, despite the fact that it is surroun­ded on 3 sides by Austin (the 4th being Cedar Park). So those 15,000 people are now part of Austin’s popu­la­tion, or will be (the 7xx,xxx figure doesn’t include it I don’t think).

    There’s an equi­val­ent neigh­bor­hood in Southwest Austin that falls under that scen­ario, Tanglewood Forest (larger than Anderson Mill even). Those are examples of two neigh­bor­hoods that were built out in the 1970’s and always were going to be made part of Austin regard­less, yet have not been coun­ted due to the fact that they weren’t form­ally annexed.

    The vast major­ity of growth in Austin has been suburban, but all zip codes have registered posit­ive growth, so it’s really just your stand­ard sign of a sunbelt economy that’s strong and not full of people who hate the city proper.

    The real­ity is that Austin is well poised, like Houston, to main­tain its compet­it­ive edge with annex­a­tion even if there are Round Rocks, Pflugervilles, Budas and Cedar Parks. Because Austin has plenty of open land within Austin city limits that will soon become subdi­vi­sions — I was driv­ing down South 1st a few nights ago, well past the spot where i thought it ended. There are subdi­vi­sions all over the place and that’s right inside the Austin ISD as well as Austin city limits.

    Also, some of the growth has been in the form of large apart­ment heavy corridors. 620 between 2222 and Anderson Mill must have 10,000+ people just in the apart­ment build­ings, and that’s all Austin city limits. There are dozens of complexes along that road now — I remem­ber when there was not a single thing on this 5 mile stretch. There was a Thundercloud Subs, a 711 and a Jack Brown clean­ers at 2222 and that was IT.

    Either way, the Austin economy is driven by Austin still, and it will continue to, so whether I like the sprawl or not, Round Rock doing well means Austin is doing well, at least in respect to the metro area’s current economic structure.

  5. M1EK

    Nice old map finds here. This is actu­ally the first time I’ve ever seen these older align­ments of US-183. Very interesting.

    State Street” is 35th west of the 34th/38th split, likely named that due to the State School (on 35th just west of Mopac).

  6. M1EK

    Oh and Forest Trail does still exist today — I’ve driven on it in Tarrytown. Kind of an odd short­cut from Enfield to Windsor.

Leave a Reply